http://www.martin-english.com/whatsup/2007/01/wikipedia-takes-but-doesnt-give/ A general journal and / or notebook, containing ideas, links of interest, and so on. Mainly for me Sat, 06 Mar 2010 13:39:01 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 http://www.martin-english.com/whatsup/2007/01/wikipedia-takes-but-doesnt-give/comment-page-1/#comment-3783 Anush Sun, 28 Jan 2007 19:52:34 +0000 http://www.martin-english.com/whatsup/2007/01/wikipedia-takes-but-doesnt-give/#comment-3783 Hey, good deal! It was the "external nofollow" I was talking about, actually, but Akismet is certainly a step in the right direction :) Hey, good deal! It was the “external nofollow” I was talking about, actually, but Akismet is certainly a step in the right direction

]]> http://www.martin-english.com/whatsup/2007/01/wikipedia-takes-but-doesnt-give/comment-page-1/#comment-3739 Martin English Fri, 26 Jan 2007 11:51:04 +0000 http://www.martin-english.com/whatsup/2007/01/wikipedia-takes-but-doesnt-give/#comment-3739 Hi Anush, after months / years of manually controlling spam, the fact that I've got a comment from a real person who wanted to know why I moderated my comments has finally convinced to start using <a href="http://akismet.com/" akismet</a rel="nofollow">, and stop moderating.</a> Hi Anush, after months / years of manually controlling spam, the fact that I’ve got a comment from a real person who wanted to know why I moderated my comments has finally convinced to start using , and stop moderating.

]]> http://www.martin-english.com/whatsup/2007/01/wikipedia-takes-but-doesnt-give/comment-page-1/#comment-3716 Anush Thu, 25 Jan 2007 20:44:47 +0000 http://www.martin-english.com/whatsup/2007/01/wikipedia-takes-but-doesnt-give/#comment-3716 By the way, why does your comments section "take without giving?" By the way, why does your comments section “take without giving?”

]]> http://www.martin-english.com/whatsup/2007/01/wikipedia-takes-but-doesnt-give/comment-page-1/#comment-3715 Anush Thu, 25 Jan 2007 20:43:49 +0000 http://www.martin-english.com/whatsup/2007/01/wikipedia-takes-but-doesnt-give/#comment-3715 Isn't there a better way to fight spam? If a site is linked from Wikipedia and the links stays up, the site ought to be able to benefit! This seems to contradict Wikipedia's stated goal of spreading knowledge. Isn’t there a better way to fight spam? If a site is linked from Wikipedia and the links stays up, the site ought to be able to benefit! This seems to contradict Wikipedia’s stated goal of spreading knowledge.

]]>