Comments on: 9/11 conspiracy theories debunked on History Channel http://www.martin-english.com/whatsup/2007/08/911-conspiracy-theories-debunked-on-history-channel/ A general journal and / or notebook, containing ideas, links of interest, and so on. Mainly for me Wed, 14 Jul 2010 11:05:11 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0 By: Ron http://www.martin-english.com/whatsup/2007/08/911-conspiracy-theories-debunked-on-history-channel/comment-page-1/#comment-4760 Ron Wed, 22 Aug 2007 21:38:35 +0000 http://www.martin-english.com/whatsup/2007/08/911-conspiracy-theories-debunked-on-history-channel/#comment-4760 There's only one important question concerning the attacks, did the US gov't allow/participate in 9/11? The answer to that query would explain the illegal wire-taps, suspension of habeas corpus, banning of books like "America Deceived" from Amazon, detaining of dissenters in fences miles away from events, and multiple wars based on lies. How can the gov't be innocent in 9/11 when we have caught it lying so many times (WACO, Ruby Ridge, no WMDs, USS Liberty, Operation Northwoods, Gulf of Tonkin, Pearl Harbor, ETC.)? In law, if you determine a person lies ONCE during his testimony, it can be assumed that he lied in the remainder of his testimony. How come we do not hold the gov't to the same standard as it holds us to? The gov't lied to us about Iraq and more Americans have died there than in 9/11. If the gov't lied about Iraq then why is everyone so reluctant to believe that the gov't lied about 9/11? Final link (before Google Books bends to pressure and drops the title): http://www.iuniverse.com/bookstore/book_detail.asp?&isbn=0-595-38523-0 There’s only one important question concerning the attacks, did the US gov’t allow/participate in 9/11?

The answer to that query would explain the illegal wire-taps, suspension of habeas corpus, banning of books like “America Deceived” from Amazon, detaining of dissenters in fences miles away from events, and multiple wars based on lies.

How can the gov’t be innocent in 9/11 when we have caught it lying so many times (WACO, Ruby Ridge, no WMDs, USS Liberty, Operation Northwoods, Gulf of Tonkin, Pearl Harbor, ETC.)?

In law, if you determine a person lies ONCE during his testimony, it can be assumed that he lied in the remainder of his testimony. How come we do not hold the gov’t to the same standard as it holds us to?

The gov’t lied to us about Iraq and more Americans have died there than in 9/11. If the gov’t lied about Iraq then why is everyone so reluctant to believe that the gov’t lied about 9/11?

Final link (before Google Books bends to pressure and drops the title):
http://www.iuniverse.com/bookstore/book_detail.asp?&isbn=0-595-38523-0

]]>